tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2266478817448155510.post3595919275134454895..comments2023-07-16T04:42:18.352-07:00Comments on Aether Wave Theory: AWT and particle model of quantum mechanicsZephirhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2266478817448155510.post-20267326185887627902009-06-17T13:58:34.734-07:002009-06-17T13:58:34.734-07:00Thanks for emphasizing the importance of Couder...Thanks for emphasizing the importance of Couder's interference experiments with bouncing droplets in order to understand the behaviour of light. I wonder why physicists like de Broglie, Bohm or Bell never thought of specifying such experiments. They would have been much stronger in defending their intuitive views. <br><br>You made me aware of these droplet experiments in <a href="http://www.haloscan.com/comments/lumidek/7473448058619697646/" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">a discussion on The Reference Frame</a> a few months ago. Thanks.<br><br>ArjenArjen Dijksmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09450431291713605237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2266478817448155510.post-736306191524340652009-06-13T09:41:40.884-07:002009-06-13T09:41:40.884-07:00Yes, droplets at the watter surface waves can mode...Yes, droplets at the watter surface waves <a href="http://news.softpedia.com/news/Paradigmatic-Quantum-Effect-Observed-in-a-Macroscopic-System-37815.shtml" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">can model</a> probability waves of particle-particle interaction by the same way, like dense elastic fluids. The gradual decay of particles in contact with water surface is an direct analogy of particles in contact with flat space-time of vacuum. It illustrates, the existence of matter is quite temporal only. I'd reccomend you to see the breathtaking video section of <a href="http://www.diffusion.ens.fr/index.php?res=conf&idconf=1535#" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">Couder's presentations</a>.<br><br>An <a href="http://prl.aps.org/accepted/L/b907eYb3P601c12eb16c40e8705bf33d2c569b2b2" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">upcoming paper</a> of Couder's group in PRL even suggests a quantum tunneling analogy with ordinary droplets.<br><br>Note, how these fundamental experiments are ignored by mainstream - as they clearly demonstrate the particle nature of vacuum phenomena and quantum mechanics, which mainstream scientists aren't willing to admit, because of their fear of Aether concept.Zephirhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2266478817448155510.post-25939374970099197052009-06-13T03:11:57.074-07:002009-06-13T03:11:57.074-07:00Zephir,Have you seen this video (doubled to Spanis...Zephir,<br><br>Have you seen this <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbjE9Ni9pDU&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Flacomunidad.elpais.com%2Fapuntes-cientificos-desde-el-mit%2F2009%2F6%2F8%2Fgotas-agua-como-nunca-antes-has-visto&feature=player_embedded" title="" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">video (doubled to Spanish)</a>? In the video can be seen as the particles exist on the surface of a fluid, and how some particles can decay into more light particles, so AWT can explain particle physics. I think AWT is a completely valid model.El Cidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09678281314664352341noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2266478817448155510.post-63663552249064940722009-06-11T16:26:06.948-07:002009-06-11T16:26:06.948-07:00/*..AWT supports de Broglie-Bohm theory..*/ It ind.../*..AWT supports de Broglie-Bohm theory..*/ <br><br>It indeed does and I see nothing fundamentally wrong on its many-particle formalism. AWT just introduces a concept of nested dimensions into it. In certain sense, gravity field is the pilot wave resulting from omnidirectional vacuum collapse / space-time expansion and phi-field corresponds the mass/energy density of vacuum.<br><br>By AWT here's a dynamic equillibrium between ontological and other less or more positivistic intepretations of QM. In AWT Aether is infinitelly dense and nested particle system, a probability field of fractal space-time curvatures - here's no "onthological bottom", which would enable us to fix the absolute perspective for us. In certain sense AWT is even more relative in its consequences, then the string theory with its limited number of space-time dimensions. Despite of these conceptual subtleties just the dense Aether model explains, why and how de Broglie-Bohm approach was farseeing and surprisingly exact model of reality.<br><br>Personally I do believe, just the Aether conotations of de Broglie-Bohm theory have lead to its refusal by mainstream. And of course the politics of McCarthy era - Bohm's holistic and materialistic approach was considered a sign of communism in 50's.Zephirhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2266478817448155510.post-22654599002375120272009-06-11T11:09:35.830-07:002009-06-11T11:09:35.830-07:00Zephir,“By AWT Schrödinger equation describes elas...Zephir,<br><br>“<i>By AWT Schrödinger equation describes elastic string (red line on the animation bellow), the mass density of which (blue line on the animation bellow) is proportional to energy density of string in each space/time interval</i>“<br><br>Very interesting, I didn't know that. If I haven't misunderstood the post then I think the AWT supports de Broglie-Bohm theory. Although, there are many consistent interpretations of quantum mechanics, I always had hope that the ontological interpretation was the correct one.El Cidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09678281314664352341noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2266478817448155510.post-64265071884149186922009-05-31T21:53:36.215-07:002009-05-31T21:53:36.215-07:00Lord Kelvin in 1880: "Newtonian mechanics is ...Lord Kelvin in 1880: "Newtonian mechanics is the universe in the deepest way possible. To deny it is pure lunacy".<br><br>Contemporary physicists have derived many advanced models of reality, but they "forget" to analyze their connection of Newtonian mechanics, because of positivistic religion and shortseeing politic.Zephirhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06010623752049244967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2266478817448155510.post-87242891794975880912009-05-28T13:28:20.588-07:002009-05-28T13:28:20.588-07:00BLABLABLABLABLABLAAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com