Despite its conceptual simplicity, this system becomes irreducibly complex with increasing of particle density, because it forms fractaly nested density fluctuations composed of density fluctuations. Such behavior can be both simulated by computers, both modeled by dense gas condensation (supercritical fluid at the right picture) and the resulting complexity is limited just by computational power. Which means, AWT principle enables to model systems of arbitrary complexity just by recursive application of trivial mechanism. If nothing else, we should consider this model because of its simplicity and the fact, nobody did propose it for modeling of observable reality, yet.

The main reason for reintroduction of Aether theory back into mainstream physics is better and more consistent and universal understanding of fundamental connections of reality. Most of these motivations weren't never presented by mainstream physics and they're forming the theorems, i.e. testable predictions of AWT at the same moment, because they can be derived from ab-initio simulation of nested density fluctuations of Boltzmann particle gas. This list bellow will be extended by new ideas occasionally.

- Explanation of energy spreading by light

The spreading of inertial energy requires inertial environment. We cannot use the energy concept for light waves spreading, while ignoring mass concept, the mass-energy equivalence in particular. - Explanation of wave character of light.

Only system of mutually colliding particles can spread energy in waves, vacuum shouldn't be any exception. - Explanation of finite frequency of light.

Only system of nonzero mass density can spread waves of finite frequency, as follows from wave equation. - Explanation of high light energy density/frequency achievable.

Classical models of luminiferous Aether were based on sparse gas model of Aether, which cannot spread the waves of energy density corresponding to gamma or cosmic radiation frequency. - Explanation of light speed invariance.

Light speed invariance is consequence of Aether concept and the fact, the light speed is the fastest energy spreading observable (if wee neglect the gravity waves, which are too faint to be observable), so we can use only light for observation of reality, the light speed/spreading in particular. - Explanation of absence of reference frame for light spreading in vacuum.

If we use the light for observation of light spreading in luminiferous Aether, it's motion/reference frame can be never locally observed just by using of light waves, because no object can serve as a subject and as a mean of observation at the same moment. - Explanation/prediction of transversal character of light waves.

In particle environment, only transversal waves can remain independent to environment reference frame by the same way, like motion of capillary waves at water surface. - Explanation/prediction of foamy structure of vacuum.

Only foam structure composed of "strings" and "(mem)branes" can spread energy in transversal waves through bulk particle environments (string and brane theories) and/or provide the properties of elastic fluid, composed of "spin loops" vortices (LQG theory). - Explanation/prediction of two vector character of transversal light waves.

Only nested foam structure can promote the light spreading in two mutually perpendicular vectors of electrical and magnetic intensity (1, 2). The formation of nested density fluctuations can be observed experimentally during condensation of supercritical fluid (1). - Explanation/prediction of uncertainty principle.

The transversal character of surface waves is always violated on behalf of underwater waves. Inside of inhomogeneous particle system the energy is always spreading in both transversal, both longitudinal waves, thus violating the predictability/determinism of energy spreading and introducing an indeterminism into phenomena, mediated/observed by using it. - Explanation/prediction of particle/wave duality.

Every isolated energy wave (a soliton) increases the Aether foam density temporarily by the same way, like the soap foam gets dense during shaking due the spontaneous symmetry breaking. As the result, every soliton spreads like less or more pronounced gradient/blob of Aether density and it bounces from internal walls of surface gradient of such blob like standing wave packet, i.e. particle (1). - Explanation/prediction of virtual particles.

The concept of virtual particles, which appear and dissapear temporarily in vacuum is typical behavior of density fluctuations inside of every gas or fluid and physics knows no other way, in which such behavior can be realized. - Explanation/definition of time dimension and space-time concept.

...

"..*People have often tried to figure out ways of getting these new concepts. Some people work on the idea of the axiomatic formulation of the present quantum mechanics. I don't think that will help at all. If you imagine people having worked on the axiomatic formulation of the Bohr orbit theory, they would never have been led to Heisenberg's quantum mechanics. They would never have thought of non-commutative multiplication as one of their axioms which could be challenged. In the same way, any future development must involve changing something which people have never challenged up to the present, and which will not be shown up by an axiomatic formulation..*."

Paul A.M. Dirac, in Development of the Physicist's conception of Nature, In The Physicists conception of Nature ed.Jaghdish Metra, D. Reidel, 1973., pp 1-14.

AWT and mainstream physics? LOL, theese two things share exactly nothing in commom (;-)

OdpovědětVymazatHAHA..No math, no valid explanation, just a word salad...(:-D)

OdpovědětVymazatEinstein: "You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother."

OdpovědětVymazatYou see, no math is mentioned here...;-) AWT can explain many concepts of mainstream physics by particle environment analogies, but not vice versa. Particle models are naturaly singular (zero dimensional objects in infinite dimensional space) and parallelized, therefore no math based on consecutive logic can be applied here in general case.

http://superstruny.aspweb.cz/images/fyzika/simulace/fluid1.gif

For example, the above particle simulation is impossible to express/derive by using of formal math, albeit it appears quite simple - by such way, a whole large portion of observable reality is effectivelly hidden for formal approach. If nothing else, the particle models are effective in many real cases of fluid modelling - so why not to use them for example in description of nuclear physics?

There is any experimental proof that supports the AWT. The aether it is only a concept without any experimental evidence so is only a metaphysics, a philosophy!

OdpovědětVymazatThe stance of yours just illustrates, nothing changed in human thinking from medieval era - which is somewhat alarming finding, in fact.

OdpovědětVymazatThe simplest experimental evidence of Aether is wave character of light. The Brownian motion of He3 atoms can serve as an evidence of Aether too, because hellium doesn't freeze even at the absolute zero temperature.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrbRzxEuHFU

OdpovědětVymazatI can understand your shocking feeling completelly...;-)

OdpovědětVymazatTill now scientists simply didn't realize, the particle environment cannot be observed by its own waves, therefore the (motion /reference frame of) vacuum cannot be observed by using of light. The negative result of M-M experiment therefore doesn't mean a refusal of Aether concept, but (one of) the confirmations of it.

The idea of sparse luminiferous Aether violates the high energy density of gamma radiation, which the sparse environment cannot mediate. While the sparse particles mediate the energy in longitudinal waves, from dense Aether concept of AWT follows the transversal character of light and foamy structure of vacuum.

By such way, dense Aether concept violate anything, what we know about light energy spreading through vacuum. These connections can be used for experimental confirmation of AWT even without math on conceptual level by the same way, like the existence of stellar parallax and/or Venus phases can confirm the heliocentric model without further computations.

The fact, these trivial ideas weren't considered before many years by mainstream science just demonstrates, how shortseeing the intersubjective thinking still is.

After all, the duality of sparse and dense Aether models is analogous to duality of geocentric and heliocentric models and history of physics just repeats here. Suddenly we realized, observable Universe forms just a tiny part of larger (if not infinite) reality.

No wonder, the people like you will fight against such view of reality by the same way, like they battled against heliocentric model before forty hundred years. Such stance is quite logical and easily predictable by AWT.

I think AWT is brilliant. I just posted a similar theory at www.afinelightopera.com. It proposed that the Schwarzschild vacuum lattice solution demonstrates the vacuum density field is a lattice of energy vibrating at trans-Plankian dimensions. All matter and light interact with this vibrating lattice energy creating the stability of the universe. I propose the black hole model of the universe also. I am a non-scientist so I approach the subject as a philosophical exercise. No fancy equations; just thought experiments. Anyway it is consistent with your Aether Wave Theory. I hope you don't mind, but i put a link to your blog. If you want me to take it down, just let me know. I applaud your tireless work.

OdpovědětVymazatThank you for your interest about AWT. If you're interested about it, your approach to Aether roughly corresponds the subject of Dr. Frank Wilczek's research of lattice gauge theory.

OdpovědětVymazathttp://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9907E4DF1238F931A35751C0A96F958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all

Although "free fermion models" of Aether free of any ad-hoced geometric constrains appears more general for me, the lattice approach may become computationally more effective in analogy to CFD.

Bože Srnko seš ty ale nenapravitelný trumbera, tolik ztracenýho času na takový beznadějný hovadiny, navíc si očividně pomáháš fejky :-))

OdpovědětVymazatAnonymous: dyk mu nekaz jeho radost, co mu zbejva, no mozna takovy krapitko skromnosti by mu pomohlo.

OdpovědětVymazat